The Inevitable What About The Inevitable You-Know-Who Thread Thread

[HudsonHawk]

@SidDithers

Ill just leave fhis gem from the Rude Pundit here:

Seriously, how fucking sorry-ass do you need to be to sit there and think that every single juror, members of the law enforcement, judges, and officials are all in a massive conspiracy, that everything is “rigged,” rather than just fucking accepting that the cockscab is a criminal and you’ve been suckered?

You have to remember, these people are still convinced the Kraken will be released and JFK, Jr. is gonna show up at their birthday party.

[gundy]

@D.WARD

a Democrat simpleton

There you go with your assumptions.

@D.WARD

Do normal citizens have secret service protection?

Sure, when they leave office.

@D.WARD

Then you are cool with Alito not recusing himself from Trump cases.

Yes. The flag thing is not grounds for recusal, despite it raising some eyebrows.

@D.WARD

What was the crime? You can’t seem to tell me either.

I already explained it to you. Go read it. To distill it further… He falsified business records in order to conceal another felonious act. That was the charge. You may not agree that those things happened, but its abundantly clear that you neither read the transcripts nor reviewed the documentary evidence. The jury understood the charges and they had literal front row seats to the evidence presentation. They unanimously agreed that the evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he did just that. Trump’s lawyers put on literally zero evidence tending to disprove the charged act.

@D.WARD

Would you be ok with the case being tried in Florida? Specifically with Judge Cannon over the case?

Why in the hell would a violation of NY state law, committed in New York, be tried in Florida federal court? This is what I was getting at when I said you demonstrate zero grasp of any legal concepts. You’re armchair lawyering is laughable. You DO understand that you are engaging with ACTUAL FUCKING LAWYERS around here that know what they’re talking about, right?

@D.WARD

So targeting your political opponent and having him charged by a Biden donor all while not letting Trump’s legal team call witnesses is constitutional.

First, neither you nor anyone else has a shred of evidence to support this claim. You are speculating based on suspicions and circumstantial conspiracy theories. That is not how lawsuits work. Second, even if that were true, point to a constitutional provision you believe was violated. Be specific, counselor.

@D.WARD

Hand picked by Democrats. Sure, it’s all fair I am sure. They were misled by the judge with his bullshit instructions.

You believe the venire was hand-picked, or the actual seated jury? What is your evidence supporting that claim? You understand that defense counsel participated in voir dire, right?

@D.WARD

I would.

you also bet that the jury in this case and the judge in the fraud trials would let him walk. How’s that going for you?

[D.WARD (Scott)]

@gundy

There you go with your assumptions.

It’s a fact.

@gundy

Sure, when they leave office.

Tell us about your personal secret service guards

@gundy

Yes. The flag thing is not grounds for recusal, despite it raising some eyebrows.

You love Alito and you also love the job Cannon is doing and think she should stay on Trump’s document case.

@gundy

already explained it to you. Go read it. To distill it further… He falsified business records in order to conceal another felonious act. That was the charge. You may not agree that those things happened, but its abundantly clear that you neither read the transcripts nor reviewed the documentary evidence. The jury understood the charges and they had literal front row seats to the evidence presentation. They unanimously agreed that the evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he did just that. Trump’s lawyers put on literally zero evidence tending to disprove the charged act

To put it simply, you are an uneducated individual who doesn’t know his head from his ass when it comes to law. Trump was not allowed to call his witnesses or present evidence because the Biden donor did not allow it.

@gundy

Why in the hell would a violation of NY state law, committed in New York, be tried in Florida federal court? This is what I was getting at when I said you demonstrate zero grasp of any legal concepts. You’re armchair lawyering is laughable. You DO understand that you are engaging with ACTUAL FUCKING LAWYERS around here that know what they’re talking about, right?

It should not be in a court with a Biden donor judge who has a daughter who was employed by Biden and pencil neck Schift. You certainly aren’t a lawyer. You might sweep the floors of a dollar general (nothing wrong with that.)

@gundy

First, neither you nor anyone else has a shred of evidence to support this claim. You are speculating based on suspicions and circumstantial conspiracy theories. That is not how lawsuits work. Second, even if that were true, point to a constitutional provision you believe was violated. Be specific, counselor

There is plenty of evidence, but it doesn’t matter when you answer to Biden/Barry. Democrats look the other way when it comes to evidence that supports Trump.

@gundy

You believe the venire was hand-picked, or the actual seated jury? What is your evidence supporting that claim? You understand that defense counsel participated in voir dire, right?

I’m saying that the judge and jury were hand picked Trump haters. What is your evidence saying they weren’t? You have none.

@gundy

you also bet that the jury in this case and the judge in the fraud trials would let him walk. How’s that going for you?

Actually I said long ago that he would likely be found guilty and would have to appeal. Your reading comprehension is lacking. Thankfully you don’t have to do much of that with your current job.

[Limey (Ray Ward)]

@austro

So, in your opinion, somebody accused of violating the laws of New York should be tried in, say, Oklahoma? That’s an interesting theory.

I bet Jack Smith would give at least one testicle to be able to move the stollen documents case out of Florida.

[HudsonHawk]

@Limey

@austro

So, in your opinion, somebody accused of violating the laws of New York should be tried in, say, Oklahoma? That’s an interesting theory.

I bet Jack Smith would give at least one testicle to be able to move the stollen documents case out of Florida.

The left or the right?

[austro (Mark)]

The right. Duh.

[jnh]

Seems to me Blanche has masterfully set this case up for appeal on the grounds of incompetent representation.

[Texifornia]

@Matt

Even had a little spot making Texas breakfast tacos.

When? I left Los Feliz in '92 and I’m sure I would have found it.

[gundy]

That’s an extremely high bar to clear… the lawyer has to be basically brain-dead and unresponsive to establish incompetency. This case is nowhere NEAR that.

[Limey (Ray Ward)]

Blanche is on record as saying that he and Trump made all the decisions together. So Trump absolutely had incompetent counsel, but not one against whom he can appeal.

[gundy]

@D.WARD

I think they should be tried in an impartial location by an impartial judge and impartial jury

unfortunately, the US Supreme Court does not share your lofty concerns.

[Matt]

Oh this was in 2011.

[D.WARD (Scott)]

@gundy

unfortunately, the US Supreme Court does not share your lofty concerns.

Looking forward to the reversal once the case gets in their hands.

[D.WARD (Scott)]

Can The Supreme Court Intervene After Trump’s Conviction? Legal Experts Say Yes.

[D.WARD (Scott)]

Dem clients of daughter of NY judge in Trump hush-money trial raised $93M off...

[JohnS (John R. Schieffer)]

Mental. Fucking. Midgets, the lot of them.

And, comma, abject losers.

[D.WARD (Scott)]

People who support Democrats are useful idiots for the Democrat party. It’s unbelievable how blind and brain dead they are. I try to give them the benefit of the doubt when talking to them. It really gets old having to dumb everything down for them though. We need to gather up all Democrats, place them in California and leave them there.

[Limey (Ray Ward)]

Hehe

[Limey (Ray Ward)]

Now that he has been convicted of 34 felonies, Trump will have to meet with his newly appointed probation officer. This will be in the next week or two - i.e. before sentencing. Amongst other things, he will undergo a drug test.

Oh, and…

[Limey (Ray Ward)]

Trump goes full Lex Luthor.

Biden-Harris HQ (@bidenharrishq) on Threads