Yes — any time a reliever comes in with a lead and fails to hold it.
Top of first “we” score three.
Bottom of first the starter loads the bases on 12 straight balls and gets lifted. Reliever gives up a home run then records 27 straight outs. Meanwhile, “we” score twice more and win 5-4.
Not exactly, the reliever has to enter the game in a “save situation,” meaning somebody else has to be in line for the W. In your scenario, the starter cannot get the win because he failed to pitch 5 innings so the reliever would not be in a “save situation” at any point, thus no blown save.
Oops. You are correct. And having the scorekeeper assign the win if the starter does not go 5 eliminates most of the outlandish scenarios. Save % is still a pretty useless stat, though.
Sorry, @Doyce7 I don’t normally take time to read a 156 word post, tho I have been know for high volume at times. My limit is around 15- 30 words.
I get this.
TEAM blown saves IS useless and perhaps the “Blown saves” stat is an overstatement. And “Blown leads” may be more apt, since a “save” is only possible with the last out.
Individual blown leads and deficits held may be more useful, particularly for pitchers in non-save situations - close to last out.
For example:
Joe Kelly is 6 for 7 with blown leads, while Devenski is 5 for 5 and Montero is 5 for 6.
Now THAT s/b a measure for a reliever, a warning to a manager.
In last night’s game Stanek and Montero had “deficits held”, my new stat for “keeping the opponent from increasing their lead”.
If only we had a stat that incorporated leads held and deficits held, you could even include keeping a game tied. We could call it runs allowed, I know it sounds crazy but go with me here. Runs allowed may not be good enough because guys pitch different amount of innings, so we need a constant. Lets just use 9 innings, so we can see how many runs a guy gives up per 9 innings pitched. I think I’ll call it ERA.