I read that book several times waaaay back in the 80s. And I thought the same thing when I read Da Vinci Code–like hey, I swear I’ve read this before.
Although calling it a history book is playing pretty fast and loose with the term. A great read though, better than Brown’s book for sure.
He absolutely did. One of the characters in TDC is an anagram for one of the writers of HBHG. I have no real interest at this stage of reading the latter, but I wish I had earlier in my life. I remember thinking it sounded pretty interesting when I read about it in Robert Anton Wilson’s Everything is Under Control, a sort-of encyclopedia of conspiracies/paranormal/alien/etc.
Melting your mind is a rather apt description of reading Foucault’s Pendulum. Amazing book, one I need to go back and reread.
When I finally read TDC, felt like such a blatant rip off of FC. Doesn’t help that Dan Brown is a hell of a mediocre writer.
We started with episode 1, season 1, because we’d forgotten all of it. Parker Posey is Dr Smith. Parker Posey. That is pretty amazing.
That’s quite possibly the most amusingly terrible novel I’ve ever read. it just kept escalating, I couldn’t put it down.
As far as follow ups to smash best sellers go, it was really bad.
But not as bad as Andy Weir following The Martian with Artemis.
I couldn’t read Foucoults Pendulum, and kinda liked The Da Vinci Code. I know you will all think less of me, and I know that’s just wrong, but take this in the spirit of the Name of the Rose: confession.
Don’t get me wrong, I liked Da Vinci Code too. Then I read more of his books and oh god they got so bad.
Name of the Rose is an amazing book, one of the best I’ve ever read. As soon as I finished it I ran out to buy Foucault’s Pendulum. I got about fifty pages in.
(It wasn’t necessarily a hard read, I just found the setting of Name of the Rose extremely captivating, and the different vibe in Foucault’s Pendulum didn’t hook me the same way.)
They’re all the same. The first one you read is a good fun read type book and then you read another one and realize it’s always the old guy former mentor that is the bad guy. I even read a couple just to test this and it’s true. The same story, different names.
So if I just re-read the Da Vinici Code every time he published a new novel, I’d have read the new novel?
I just started on Season 1 yesterday. I like it. I too like Molly Parker. I had a major crush on Penny (Angela Cartwright) when the original series ran, Now I’m much older and drawn towards Maureen (Molly Parker, not June Lockhart).
June Lockhart wasn’t chopped liver!
Expanse Season 6 dropped on Amazon.
I just finished the final book and am starting season 1
I’m doing a couple chapters in the final book each night before bed. I expect to finish in 2024.
I’m forcing myself to finish book 6 before starting season 6. I’m about halfway done.
I find it a little like ASOIAF in that I could certainly tell you most of what has occurred but I’ll be damned if I could tell you what happened in which book.
Because of this thread I read the first eight Expanse books earlier this year and devoured the final one last week. Similar to MM, I don’t really recall exactly when everything happened, mainly because the titles have little to nothing to do with the events of each book.
I think it’s easier to think about it in terms of a trio of related volumes (Earth-Mars conflict, Ring gates/exploration, Free Navy conflict) and the Laconia trilogy at the end.
Yes. This kills me. The books might as well have gibberish titles.