So you’re ok if we expand those programs to cover more people?
It will be to some who receive it.
I don’t oppose to helping people as long as they help themselves.
So if there was a plan to require everyone to have health insurance, either privately or sponsored by the government for those who don’t have access to private insurance, and there was some sort of fine or tax implication for not having it…you know, to make up for those who refuse so that everyone would have to put something towards health care…you’d have no objection to it?
1 Like
But you don’t want to require them to help themselves…no treading on them. Right?
How much do you pay right now in premiums, co-pays, deductibles, other uncovered expenses for medical, dental and vision?
What’s the cost to you of, say, a car wreck where you get life-flighted to an out-of-network hospital and spend days or weeks in the ICU? You got that kind of scratch?
We all know how accurate these polls were for Hillary.
Yeah…pretty much spot on.
That’s why she’s sitting at home. And Trump is still your president.
They should want to help themselves.
She lost because we’ve completely fucked up the Electoral College system, not because she got fewer votes. At least try to educate yourself a little.
But they don’t. Mostly because you don’t make them. So your complaining that they don’t, when you are directly facilitating it and refuse to correct it, rings a little hollow.
I love how you started out trying to make yourself out to be a voter of principle, but have let your veil slip over the course of the discussion to reveal you’re just full-on MAGA.
If you believe it, embrace it.
[quote=“HudsonHawk, post:654, topic:240”]
She lost because we’ve completely fucked up the Electoral College system, not because she got fewer votes. At least try to educate yourself a little.
[/quote]
She lost because we’ve completely fucked up the Electoral College system, not because she got fewer votes. At least try to educate yourself a little.
[/quote]
Oh I have educated myself. We have the electoral college because of people like crooked Hillary. Hillary lost. A whole lot of red on that map.
If the Democrats would bring in a decent candidate I would be more open. The debates have been a dumpster fire.
We have an electoral college specifically to pump the breaks on the slack jawed yokels voting in a hand-waving populist yahoo with no substance. We completely fucked it up, and now we have exactly what it was designed to prevent. But don’t worry…the day will come when someone gets elected by winning say only 10 states…and you will scream bloody murder that states like New York and California have too much say. And they will. But it will be your own doing.
And your comment about “a whole lot of red” only further illustrates that you are either willfully deceitful or hopelessly ignorant.
2 Likes
Why would you expect any different? The GOP debates in 2015-2016 were just as unwatchable.
1 Like
Though they did treat us to Trump calling Ted Cruz’s wife ugly and him bragging about the size of his dick. They were very “presidential”.
Well let’s see, we have Biden, who is running for the Senate. I worry about him having a touch of dementia. Bloomberg calling Bernie a communist. (I actually agree with him.) Warren made Bloomberg look like an idiot and it looked like he wanted to crawl in a hole after she got done with him. I think I like Warren the best of all of them and she identifies herself as an Indian and she is no more of an Indian than I am. As far as Buttigeg, I can’t support him.
Honestly, no. You’re right. The Republican one was a circus at times.