Almost ignored this article b/c of the title, but…
Enjoyed this highlight, beautifully detailing the successful Astros’ open secret - their stunning success tracking and signing older, REJECTED, Latin prospects (Blanco, etc.) - but couldn’t believe the besmirching title…
Not sure if this is sarcasm or not. I skimmed the article and didn’t get the impression that she was accusing the Astros of cheating. “Cheat code” is a compliment, not a pejorative. If you want to say it’s a cheeky backhanded compliment because it’s used in this specific context with regard to the Astros, then… maybe? I don’t know anything about the author and have no intention of litigating her previous work to find out.
I guess I’m in work mode right now. Normally I’d probably say “utter fucking nonsense” but that might still be more polite. Snuffy is a bit of stain on this place from a “what the fuck are you even talking about” standpoint
That’s the irony: Not once in the article was the word “cheat” used. The title is repeated as a caption for Blanco’s pic.
How often is an editor tempted to choose click bait in the title - not unlike this post and other posts here?
I agree, @drewcifer, it did not describe the actual content of the article. I wonder why other teams have not started exploring older players and, if they have, they are still in the learning curve - or haven’t established a presence in those countries to matter.
@Snuffy If you keep getting offended at every piece of click bait, you are going to be offended all the time. Save the outrage for real offense not manufactured offense aimed at driving eyes.