Rosenthal frames this as a payroll choice, stating that they could get young cheap pitching (and possibly attach Reddick to him) and then lock up Springer.
I think it’s a test balloon by Astros management to see fan reaction to the idea of trading Correa, and not particularly because of payroll.
The “expectation” I was referring to was that long term, the club had to make some choices. The choice most discussed was either signing Springer long term or signing Correa long term. My feeling is that most people here expected that choice to be Springer.
So, if you think Springer is the choice, why not deal Correa soon, when you might get better value back?
Ok, so most of us knew Cole would be leaving, but now it’s a done deal. Time to move on to the rumors of Correa being traded. Could he be included in a deal for Contreras? The last one I heard was he might be included as part of a deal for Castillo from the Reds. I wonder if one might actually help the other? If we could land a legit SP like Castillo for Correa, might that also allow us to part with some starting pitching (i.e. James) as part of deal for Contreras?
I was fantasizing Correa for Nola before “d’oh”-ing myself. Phillies (had) a desperate need there and they are an offense-first franchise (they literally gave away a Gold Glove SS). Nola has 3 more yrs club control (as I understand it). Values would be about right for a deal IMO.