Well, yeah. Under any circumstances, the provision of life saving healthcare > playing a sport.
The owners are so cynical. First, they reach an agreement with the players that all salary will be prorated to the number of games played. Great. Thatās fair and reasonable by all parties. But then they try to retrade that deal, float to their media access types that they have a plan to resume on July 4th with a 50/50 split, realize they canāt retrade the deal they already made and donāt even talk about revenue split with the MLBPA or even have any sort of detailed health and safety plan given that the players/managers/field staff are the one bearing the risk of illness. And yet the prevailing story is the players are āgreedyā because they already agreed to significantly slash their pay and donāt want to slash it further in order to risk the health of themselves and their family.
These billionaire owners sure love capitalism when it comes to making a profit but turn socialist real fast when facing a loss.
Heās already agreed to a significant pay cut below the full $7mm. If the season is 82 games, heāll get half of that. He doesnāt want to renegotiate the already agreed pay cut to be reduced more.
Heās also getting paid $4,775 per day for not playing. Itās not as if heās oh, I donāt knowā¦lost his job and having to rely on that $1,200 from Trump to pay the rent. Itās hard to gen up any sympathy for him at this point.
Heās saying itās not worth the risk to play at all for only $3.5MM. Itās the full $7MM, irrespective of the number of games, or heās not playing because itās about risking the health of his family. Heāll do it for $7MM, but not for $3.5MM.
I wonder what his bottom line family risking price isā¦
This will be a moot point because the botched Grand Re-Opening is going to completely blow up any plans for re-starting MLB and the NBA or starting the NFL.